Mercury
Removal from Hydrocarbon
Dissolved elemental mercury (Hgo)
and mercury compound is removed utilized adsorbent. While mercury in solid
phase is removed by physical separation.
There are 2 components of
adsorbent, i.e.:
(1) Support,
for example zeolite, activated carbon, metal oxide, and alumina.
(2) Reactive
component, for example Ag, KI, CuS, metal sulfide, and thiol.
Materials which can disturb
adsorbent are:
-
H2S
-
water
-
olefin and aromatic hydrocarbon
-
thiol
-
other metal: arsenic
Mercury is volatile. The
volatility of mercury limited operating temperature, usually below 100oC.
Ideally operation is conducted at near ambient temperature.
Adsorbent which is utilized for
mercury removal can be divided into 2 groups, i.e. non-regenerative adsorbent
and regenerative adsorbent.
Non-regenerative mercury removal
Advantage of non-regenerative
method is:
-
Simple, “Install it and leave it!”
Disadvantage of non-regenerative
method are:
-
High installation cost.
-
There will be additional pressure drop if
adsorbent has been saturated.
-
Need cost to dispose used adsorbent.
If mercury is detected in
effluent and pressure drop through bed is exceeded, adsorbent need to be
changed with new one.
Materials which disposed from
adsorbent are:
-
Mercury
-
Others (such as benzene)
Non-regenerative mercury removal
method utilized some options below:
1. Sulfur
2. Metal
sulfide
3. Halide
4. Ion
exchange resin
1.
Sulfur
Sulfur is dispersed in porous carrier, for example activated
carbon. Sulfur impregnated at carbon. Carbon is support component, while sulfur
is reactive component.
Sulfur reacts with mercury to form HgS. This reaction
occurs fast.
Hg + S à HgS
This is old method. On 1970s LNG Badak Indonesia utilized
this method.
Quality of product depends on:
-
Quality of activated carbon (as support)
-
Method to make sulfur dispersed at carbon
Sulfur must be
dispersed properly without any blockage in porous carrier. If not, then:
-
Mercury removal process can’t be optimum.
-
Sulfur is not impregnated well; therefore sulfur
can be carried over by gas stream at high temperature.
Sulfur is
dissolved in liquid hydrocarbon. Therefore, method of impregnated sulfur at
carbon can only be utilized for gas service. Contact between adsorbent and
liquid hydrocarbon should be avoided.
Disadvantage of
this method are:
-
Used material should be disposed since it can’t
be utilized again.
-
In environmental point of view, acceptable
mercury disposal is by burning/incineration.
-
Sulfur is dissolved in liquid hydrocarbon,
especially aromatic hydrocarbon, therefore there is possibility sulfur will be
carry over in product stream.
2.
Metal sulfide
Next development is mercury removal utilized inorganic
compound/metal. Metal sulfide is dispersed at solid carrier (activated carbon,
alumina). Sulfur is impregnated at metal. Reactivity between mercury and metal
sulfide is very high.
Hg + MxSy
à MxSy-1
+ HgS
Advantages of this method are:
-
Used adsorbent can be utilized again.
-
Risk of sulfur carry over to product stream
(through sublimation or dissolution) is low.
Disadvantage of this method is:
-
Not fit for “empty” fluid.
This disadvantage can be solved by installing
pre-filter at upstream of mercury guard bed.
Metal sulfide and polysulfide can remove mercury
effectively. Common metal utilized are Cu, Zn, and proprietary metal. If
required, metal oxide can be added to remove H2S. If metal is Cu, the
reactions are:
CuO + H2S
à CuS + H2O
2 CuS + Hg à
HgS + Cu2S
Metal sulfide is utilized for gas and liquid
hydrocarbon service. This adsorbent is not damaged if contact with liquid
water.
Adsorbent pellet size is circa 0.9 – 4 mm. Pellet with
small size can increase efficiency of mercury removal, but also make high pressure
drop.
|
Pellet size
|
Small
|
Large
|
Efficiency of mercury removal
|
high
|
low
|
Pressure drop
|
high
|
low
|
3. Halida
Halide impregnate at activated carbon. This adsorbent
is utilized for liquid hydrocarbon.
Hg + I à HgI2
Liquid water can make this halide wash off from activated
carbon and make vessel corroded.
4.
Ion Exchange Resin
Ion exchange resin is utilized for liquid naphtha
service.
Regenerative mercury removal
Regenerative adsorbent is like
non-regenerative adsorbent. The difference is in mercury removal process
utilized regenerative adsorbent, there is thermal regeneration process. Usually
regenerative mercury removal is conducted simultaneously with dehydration
process or other contaminant removal process.
For example is silver (Ag) which
impregnate at molecular sieve. Mercury (from gas or liquid) will form amalgam
with silver. At high temperature mercury will be separated from silver, utilize
regeneration gas.
Advantages of regenerative method
are:
-
No additional pressure drop.
-
Mercury can be recovered as separated stream.
Disadvantage of this method are:
-
Require additional equipment for regeneration
process.
-
Gas which is utilized for regeneration probably
need additional treatment to remove mercury (secondary mercury removal
treatment).
Source:
- Interaction
of Mercury with Metal Surfaces, Johnson Matthey Catalysts, 2009.
- Carnell
and Willis, Mercury Removal from Liquid
Hydrocarbons, Johnson Matthey Catalysts, 2005.
- NUCON,
MERSORB® Mercury Adsorbents, Design and
Performance Characteristics, Bulletin 11B28 – 2010.
- Abu
El Ela, I.S. Mahgoub, M.H. Nabawi, and Abdel Azim, Mercury Monitoring and
Removal at Gas Processing Facilities: Case Study of Salam Gas Plant, Society of
Petroleum Engineer (SPE), 2008.